NGC 5529 (UGC 9127) Galaxy in Bootes
Located at: RA 14 hours 15 minutes 34 seconds; Dec +36 degrees 13 minutes 36 seconds
Size: 6.2' x 0.8'; Magnitude: 12.8 blue; Class: Sc: sp
North is up

West to the right
| Telescope: |
8" f5 Newtonian reflector |
| Camera: |
ST-8XME, self-guided, binned 1x1, temp -20c, camera control MaxIm DL 4.56 |
| Image: |
Lumicon Red filter, 560 minutes (56 x 10 minute subs), 06/28/30 & 07/1/2/2009; seeing 2.5-3.1 FWHM per CCDStack |
| Processing: |
CCDStack 1.6.0.4, Photoshop 7.0 |
| Location: |
Rolling Roof Observatory, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 (+34d 13m 29s -118h 52m 20s) |
| Notes: |
From the NGC / IC Project: Contemporary Visual Observation(s) for NGC 5529 NGC 5529 = UGC 09127 = MCG +06-31-085 = CGCG 191-069 = FGC 1735 = PGC 50942 14 15 34.2 +36 13 35 V = 11.9; Size 6.2x0.8; SB = 13.5; PA = 115d 17.5": faint, large, edge-on ~8:1 ratio WNW-ESE, 3.5'x0.4', weak concentration. Two nearby mag 14.5 stars are 1.4' S of center and off the ESE extension 3.0' from center. Forms a close pair with M+06-31-087 3.8' SE. N5557 lies 38' ENE. - by Steve GottliebHistorical Research Notes / Correction for NGC 5529 (red color mine) NGC 5529. See NGC 5527. - Dr. Harold G. Corwin, Jr.Historical Research Notes / Correction for NGC 5527 NGC 5527 is probably the object called "NGC 5524" by virtually everybody. Found by LdR on 19 April 1855, it has just the one observation recorded under LdR's entry for NGC 5529. That observation reads, "[NGC 5529], long narrow ray with a S, R, vF neb sf; another vF about 15' np [5529]; and another eeF about 6' p and 1' n of this last." Dreyer adds the note, "The positions given in the G.C. for 2 R. novae, [5524] and [5527], are not in accordance with this." In the observation, it's clear that there are four nebulae in the field. One of these, the "S, R, vF neb sf" is neither in GC nor NGC (it is one of several nebulae known to Dreyer that he did not include in NGC). The other three nebulae, N5524, N5527, and N5529 are arranged along a curve according to LdR's description. It is also clear that the new objects can have only approximate positions as no micrometric positions for them were measured at Birr Castle. An additional problem concerns the adopted positions and descriptions. The positions are by JH for GC and, as Dreyer noted, do not correspond with the description given by LdR. Dreyer switched the positions for NGC, but still got LdR's descriptions of brightness reversed -- the faintest object is clearly the western most of the objects, i.e. NGC 5524. Given all this, it is reasonable to suppose that the brightest object northwest of NGC 5529 is NGC 5527, and that a still fainter object is west- northwest of it. This makes N5527 = CGCG 191-067 (it is 17.2 arcmin from N5529), but leaves the position for NGC 5524 vacant. The object was taken to be a star by Carlson, and was noted in MCG as "Not found." There is a very faint galaxy in the right direction from N5527 that LdR might have seen, but it is almost 13 arcmin away, not 6+ arcmin as in the observation. There is also a somewhat brighter triple star on to the northwest of N5527 (14 11 42.2, +36 43 48; B1950.0, mean of the three DSS positions), but it is 9.5 arcmin from the galaxy, and is probably too bright to be called "eeF." The stars are also pretty well separated: the northern star is 30 arcsec away from the southern. The final possibility, the one I've adopted, is the double star 7.9 arcmin west-southwest of N5527. This is a reasonable choice if LdR's description reads "... another eeF about 6' p and 1' s ...." The second star of this pair is much fainter than the brighter, but may have added just a hint of nebulosity to the object. While this identity is a (reasonable) guess, it is still the best of the available options. - Dr. Harold G. Corwin, Jr. |