NGC 7129 (Lund 996, Cr 441) / LBN 497 / NGC 7133* Open Cluster / Bright Nebula in Cepheus
Located at: RA 21 hours 42 minutes 47 seconds, Dec +66 degrees 06 minutes 24 seconds
Size: 8.0' / 9.6' x 6.8'; Magnitude: --; Class: IV 2 p n / Reflection
North is up

West to the right
| Telescope: |
8" f5 Newtonian reflector |
| Camera: |
ST-8XME, self-guided, binned 1x1, temp -10c & -15c, camera control MaxIm DL 4.56 |
| Image: |
Lumicon Red filter, 720 minutes (72 x 10 minute subs), 08/23/24/26/27/2010; 1.8-3.0 FWHM per CCDStack |
| Processing: |
CCDStack 2.11.3874.21660, Photoshop 7.0 |
| Location: |
Rolling Roof Observatory, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 (+34d 13m 29s -118h 52m 20s) |
| Notes:* | NGC 7129 is the open cluster embedded in the the nebulosity of
LBN
497 .... My charting software (Megastar v5.0.12) lists NGC 7129 as about
5' West of the center of this image, and NGC 7133 as the nebulosity
(also called IC 5132/33/34) ... The
CDS indicates that at this position are NGC 7129 (open cluster in
nebulosity) and the Dark Nebula LDN 1183 (among many other objects). The
NGC / IC Project says
NGC 7133 is nonexistent. "Star Clusters", by
Brent Archinal and Steven Hynes does not list NGC 7133 as an
open cluster. NGC 7129 is about 25' NNW from the Open Cluster
NGC 7142. From the NGC / IC Project: IC 5132/33/34 Contemporary Visual Observation(s) for NGC 7129NGC 7129 = LBN 497 = IC 5134 = IC 5132 = IC 5133 21 42 59 +66 06.8 Size 8x7 17.5" (10/17/98): fairly high surface brightness nebulosity ~3'x2', surrounding three mag 9.5-10.5 stars at 220x. At 280x, the brightest region surrounds the southern star (also the brightest star) and the star to the NE. Just preceding this second star is a small knot which does not appear to be surrounding a star. A 3rd involved star on the preceding side has the weakest halo. There is an additional pair of stars nearby to the SW but they do not appear to be surrounded by halos. The entire group is encased in a diffuse glow and the surrounding region appears to be dusty. IC 5132/5133 are very weak nebulae surround mag 12 stars ~5' NNW. 17.5" (9/23/89): fairly bright reflection nebula surrounded three bright stars. The brightest portion includes the southern star. Also a bright knot is at the N end which is not surrounding a star (or the star is embedded). 13" (7/20/85): fairly bright with 0III filter but dims using a Daystar 300 filter. This nebulous region includes four or five stars and appears brighter around these stars. A small knot is at the north end and a second knot is at the south end. - by Steve GottliebHistorical Research Notes / Correction for NGC 7129 NGC 7129 is a diffuse nebula enveloping three pretty bright stars. Both Herschels described it the same, and JH measured the position angles and distances of the two flanking stars with respect to the brightest, more central southern one, BD +65 1638. His mean position for the nebula, adopted in GC and NGC, is for that star. Bigourdan apparently did not read JH's 1833 description before he examined the area in the 1884, 1889, and 1895. Bigourdan applied NGC 7129 only to the patch of nebulosity to the northwest of JH's star C, the northeastern of the three stars. He also found a "new" nebula in 1895 around JH's star A, the south-central of the three. This now carries the number IC 5134 (which see). Another "nova" from Bigourdan, NGC 7133 (which see, below), was apparently an illusion as there is nothing near his place but faint stars. - Dr. Harold G. Corwin, Jr.Historical Research Notes / Correction for NGC 7133 NGC 7133 does not exist. Bigourdan describes it as a "Pretty extended area, perhaps 2 arcmin across, in which I suspect some extremely faint nebulosity, at the extreme limit of visibility." There is nothing near his single micrometrically measured position but a few faint stars. My guess is that this is another of what he would call his "fausse images." - Dr. Harold G. Corwin, Jr.Correction Disclaimer As with all corrections to the NGC and IC Catalogues, there is a certain margin for error, even though the evidence supporting the correction may be strong and compelling. It is with this in mind that we ask the user to use this information as 'Most Probable', but never to assume the correction is 'Absolute'. All published corrections are based on an exhaustive 'paper chase' of the historical record back to the original discoverer's published notes/papers, and are therefore based upon the historical accuracy (or inaccuracy) of those particular notes/papers. In short, Caveat Emptor! - Robert E. Erdmann, Jr. |